Skip to content
Crap Movies Club, home
← Browse movies
Lunatics: A Love Story poster
CrapScore 65, Certified Crap

Lunatics: A Love Story

“You have to be a little crazy to fall in love. Hank's downright insane.”

Certified Crap. CrapScore 65, rated by 1 admin.

Higher CrapScores mean more entertainingly bad. How we score movies.

Why it’s crap
An isolated poet's fearful visions collide with a woman's spectacularly unfortunate run through Los Angeles. Ted Raimi and homemade-looking nightmares give the romance an eccentric texture. The awkward effects fit a world already being filtered through a very troubled imagination.

Nominated by @flabbergasted_jones

The club’s verdict

Acting
6/10
Plot
7.5/10
Effects
6.5/10
Dialogue
6/10
Rewatchability
6.5/10
  • “Romance has arrived, but the imaginary spider is refusing to leave.”

    @flabbergasted_jones, scored it 65

Synopsis and movie facts

In the seedy part of Los Angeles, a man who writes poetry has spent six months without leaving his apartment because of his paranoid delusions involving sadistic doctors, rappers, and spiders. A woman who seems to jinx things by wanting to help is dumped by her boyfriend and finds herself penniless on the streets, and soon runs afoul of a local gang. Due to a telephone glitch, the man calls her at a phone booth trying to dial a "talk line" and invites her to his place. There they must help each other to overcome their respective problems.

Released
1991
Directed by
Josh Becker
Running time
87 min

Starring

  • Ted Raimi as Hank Stone
  • Deborah Foreman as Nancy
  • Bruce Campbell as Ray
  • George Aguilar as Comet
  • Brian McCree as Presto
  • Eddy Roumaya as Joker
  • Michelle Stacey as Billboard Woman
  • John Hardy as Mr. Jackson

Research behind this pick

Researched . Explore the film references and reviews below.

  • Film reference · themoviedb.org

    Canonical film identity, release date, runtime, director credits, cast, genres, synopsis and poster checked against TMDB movie 31564.

  • Review · moriareviews.com

    The review calls the film a genuine oddity and notes poor models that matter less within its subjective world.

Comments 0

Log in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Somebody has to go first.

TYPE A TITLE. TYPOS ARE FINE._